Home / Case Map / Sahel
Global Climate · Regional

Sahel

Drought, land degradation and contested explanations for both.

How this page works

Six sections are filled in: the parts that are stable and factual. Four are yours — evidence, perspectives, evaluation and the current connection. Those four are where the marks are, and they are deliberately empty. A case study only counts once you have completed them.

↧ Download the Sahel template Word · ready to fill in · the six given sections already completed
Before you write about this one

This case is valuable precisely because experts disagree. Present the disagreement rather than resolving it artificially.

§ 01

The ten-part record

01 · Location Filled in for you

Sahel belt, West Africa
15.0°N 5.0°E · scale: Regional

See this case in context on the case study map.

02 · Geographic context Filled in for you

A semi-arid belt across Africa between the Sahara and the wetter south, with highly variable rainfall and populations dependent on rain-fed farming and pastoralism. The causes of degradation here are genuinely disputed.

03 · Processes Filled in for you

What is changing here, and the mechanisms driving it.

  • High interannual rainfall variability
  • Land degradation from cultivation and grazing pressure
  • Population growth increasing demand on marginal land
  • Regreening in some areas alongside degradation in others
04 · Evidence You build this

Find these, and write the year beside every figure. A statistic without a date is not evidence.

  • Rainfall trends over recent decades
  • Evidence of vegetation change from satellite records
  • Population growth rates in Sahelian countries
  • Outcomes of specific regreening initiatives
Your figures go here
05 · Stakeholders Filled in for you

Who is affected, and separately, who holds the decision-making power.

  • Farming and pastoralist households
  • National governments across the belt
  • International donors funding regreening
  • Researchers disagreeing about causes

Named above as a starting list. For each one, add what they actually want, and note where two of them want incompatible things.

06 · Perspectives You build this

Find two sources that disagree about this case — not two summaries of the same view. Record who each is, what they claim, and what interest they have. A perspective without a holder is not a perspective.

Your notes go here
07 · Concepts Filled in for you

Which of the six apply here, and what each one reveals.

  • Process. Competing explanations for the same observed change.
  • Possibility. Regreening projects show recovery is possible in places.
  • Power. Who defines the problem also defines the solution.
08 · Evaluation You build this

How significant is this? How effective was any response? What are the limitations of your evidence? What else could explain the pattern? Reach a judgement and defend it.

Your notes go here
09 · Current connection You build this

One dated development from the last twelve months. Does it strengthen, weaken or complicate the case as recorded above? Update this every time you revisit the case.

Your notes go here
10 · Exam use Filled in for you

Vulnerability, resilience, and competing interpretations of the same evidence.

Now go and build the other four

Reading this page is not the same as having a case study. Take the template, find the evidence, and fill in sections 4, 6, 8 and 9 in your own words.

↧ Download the template Or take the blank version for a case of your own
§ 02

Where to look

Start here. Prefer the organisation that produced the data over anyone summarising it.

  • UNCCD unccd.int
    The convention on desertification. Note that it has a position, not just data.
  • Our World in Data ourworldindata.org
    Rainfall, land use and population trends for the Sahelian states.
  • FAO fao.org
    Land use and agricultural production across the belt.

Links checked 27 August 2026 · external links open in a new tab

← Back to the case map